GeoInterpolations

Day 1 of FOSS4G 2009 kicked off on Wednesday, October 21, at the Sydney Convention and Exhibition Centre. Day 0 was the day of workshops, but Wednesday was the starting day of the main conference with keynote speakers and presentation sessions.

Day 1 started off with a series of keynote talks. Many of the were on high-level, vague topics and I didn’t find them particularly interesting. Show me the code. But then Paul Ramsey gave a highly informative and entertaining speech entitled Beyond Nerds Bearing Gifts: The Future of the Open Source Economy. The basic message was how the most proprietary software companies sell products (rather than software) by including value added items (installation, support, Larry, etc.) with the software that you purchase (or rent). In order to have a successful business model, open source software companies also need to sell a complete product, although in this case the software is free and the value added products are sold. Paul is a great speaker, and is able to flawlessly incorporate his mother-in-law and killer rabbits into a speech that seemed to keep everyone interested. Luckily somebody captured the talk and already posted it on YouTube, and I would encourage everyone to watch it here.

After that it is was on to the technical sessions. As usual for a FOSS4G conference, you are continuously picking between multiple interesting talks. Hopefully some of the sessions I missed were taped, and will be available for later viewing. Of the ones I that I was able to attend, here are some of talks I found the most informative…

Emmanuel Christophe gave an overview of the Orfeo Toolbox, a project that has integrated a number imaging and geospatial libraries (ITK, GDAL, OSSIM, etc) for use in the analysis of remote sensing data. It is a project funded by the French Space Agency through 2010 in order to increase the usable value of remote sensing datasets. To date, it seems that there has been a relative lack of compelling open source alternatives to proprietary remote sensing analysis packages (particularly desktop apps), so I was quite happy to see substantial development in this area and that the project is likely to be funded beyond 2010.

After lunch were a few talks on how ‘cloud computing’ and geoprocessing can work together. Bastian Schaeffer gave a quick overview of cloud computing platforms that can be used to run geospatial applications written in Java, focusing on Google’s AppEngine (less flexible, easier to setup and administer) and Amazon’s AWS (more flexible, more challenging to setup and administer). Next up, Claude Philipona gave a talk on using AWS to deploy websites created using the MapFish framework (such as http://map.veloland.ch). They had an interesting approach in solving the issue of allowing users to select which map layers are displayed while maintaining a good response time. Their solution was to create tiles of individual map layers, which are then combined on demand (server side) based on what layers the user has requested.

Other interesting talks included Volker Mishche’s Geodata and CouchDB which presented some initial work on adding geospatial query support to CouchDB, a non-relational document-oriented database with a RESTful API. It sounded promising, but I admittedly have a relational database mindset so I kept thinking how repetitive and wasteful the non-relational approach would be for complex features, and I came away thinking I need to do more reading on document-oriented databases so I can understand the potential benefits. My current impression is that they can scale to massive numbers of users, but the tradeoff is that you lose important analysis capabilities.

Later on, a couple members of the Zoo Project gave a presentation on their open OWS platform, on which developers will be able to expose their geoprocessing services as a standardized Web Processing Service (WPS). The expect their project to be released with examples and developer documentation around March 2010. One of my main goals of attending this year’s FOSS4G was to gain a better understanding of methods that are being used to create geoprocessing web services. While various WPS implementations were discussed by many presenters, nobody seemed to have working demonstrations of using WPS to do anything interesting. I’m not sure whether that is due to the complexity of the WPS spec, or whether there haven’t been enough compelling use cases to drive the development. WPS hasn’t arrived yet, but the potential is there.

For more reading, here are a few other posts on FOSS4G 2009:

• How 2 Map - FOSS4G Day n+1
• From the Inside Looking In - FOSS4G 2009 - Day 1

That’s all for now, I’ll follow up later recapping the remaining days of the conference. I have to go explore more of this beautiful city while I have the opportunity to do so…

Yesterday the Poto Chapter of the MMBA hosted the 2009 Triple Trail Challenge, a low-key mountain bike ride where riders link up the Poto, Waterloo, & Lakelands trails. It is around 40 miles, with nice sections of single track connected by dirt roads.

The organizers put out a hardcopy map, but there also have been requests for digital versions. So here goes:

1. KMZ file - A file format viewable in GoogleEarth.
2. GPX file - A generic format for GPS devices. If your GPS doesn’t support the GPX file format, you can convert this file to other GPS formats with GPS Babel application/library.

The trail data has been added to the OpenStreetMap database. Look for it appear in the OpenCycleMap tiles in the next week.

Triple Trail Challenge GPS track

Last weekend I was out in Colorado, for some quality time on snow in the mountains (which I haven’t been seeing much of lately).

My friend John and I headed up to Winter Park for a few days.  I had brought along my GPS data logger (a BGT-31, used to measure windsurfing speed records), so I could log our runs.  The snow was warm, firm, and fairly fast, and we entertained ourselves seeing how fast we could go.  The max speed recorded on the GPS increased throughout the day, and on the final run the GPS registered a speed of over 50 mph.  John was undoubtedly going faster with his downhill gear, but I was on my teles and had the ‘official’ recording device.

After we retired back in our gasthaus at the end of the day, I downloaded the track log from the GPS device and converted them into KML for viewing in Google Earth (via gpsbabel and some python scripts).  I was surprised to see that the top speed recorded was actually 61.8 mph.  My (untested) theory is that the difference was because the max speed reported was the horizontal velocity, while the KML placemarks descriptions show the 3-D velocity.

Here are some KML files of the tracks:

• 2009-03-20-morning-runs.kmz
• 2009-03-20-afternoon-runs.kmz
• 2009-03-21-morning-runs.kmz
• 2009-03-21_afternoon_runs.kmz

On the third day we headed up to Berthoud Pass for a bit of backcountry skiing. It was a nice sunny day with little wind, but the snow was a bit rotten due to the recent warm spell. John, on his retro skinny randonee setup, ended up taking a abrasive faceplant on the descent due to the funky snow conditions.  Load up the following file and navigate to 2009-03-22T18:05:27Z to see the exact location.

• 2009-03-22_ski.kmz

Last weekend was the 2008 Iceman Cometh race, near Traverse City, Michigan.  27 or so miles of single and double track fun.  This year the weather threatened to be worthy of the race’s name, but during the race it was around 40 degrees (great racing weather) and the recent precipitation made the course firm and fast.

This is the fifth year in a row that I have raced the Iceman, but the first time on my new single speed.  I ended up finishing with a personal best (2:09:14) for the course.  Less gears = faster bike?

I recorded the course this year with a high frequency GPS data logger (1 record per second).  The data is available here in KML.  If you open up the file in Google Earth you can use the time slider to play through the race.

iceman08.kmz (right click to save)

I also loaded the route onto OpenStreetMap.  The cycle specific rendering can be found here:

http://opencyclemap.org/?lat=44.73977&lon=-85.20621&zoom=14&layers=B000

Long live long rides…

Today John, Karen, and I took advantage of the sunny weather and cool temperatures to ride the Poto trail.  It was sort of a warm-up for next weeks Poto Single Speed World Championships (or whatever they are officially calling it this year), which is a warm-up for the Iceman race in November.

It was a good fall ride, where you tend to pass orange folks with guns on the trail.  The Gunnar SS works pretty well, except for the GPS mount, which came loose after a couple of miles.  I ended up stuffing the GPS in my jersey, where it seemed to collect just fine, and now there is a nice map of the Poto.  I plan on posting the route to OpenStreetMap, where it should appear on the cycle map in the next week or so…

The data was collected by a Locosys BGT-31, set to record position every second.

I recently finished building a 29er rigid single speed. Today was its inaugural trip around the local trails of Ann Arbor. Overall, it is quite fun to ride. The swept bars will take a little time to get used to, but they seem to provide better leverage and balance than standard bars for standing and climbing. Next stop Iceman…

Description: Park Service Plastic Hexagonal

Story: This outhouse is located at the trailhead for the Halemau’u trail in Halealaka National Park. John and I left our car here and hitchhiked to the Sliding Sands trailhead for the start of our volcano crater hike.

Location: Halemau’u Trailhead, Haleakala National Park, Maui, Hawaii

Photo Credit: Tyler

Last night we threw the camping stuff and the dog in the car and headed out to Pinckney State Park to get back to nature (in a state-owned and managed sense).

Eddy seemed to enjoy the trip, and was proud of successfully defending the campsite from the local raccoon.